Choosing a Shotgun Microphone: The Long and Short of It

One of the most misunderstood types of microphones is the interference-type line microphone, commonly referred to as a “shotgun” microphone. It’s pretty clear how it got this nickname. It’s much longer than a typical end-address microphone and resembles the barrel of a shotgun. You may have seen them at press and sporting events or on movie sets, mounted to a boom pole or strapped to the top of a camera.

Why is it so long? Why are there so many lengths available? When do you need a shotgun mic? Which length is right for you? This post will answer all of those questions.

Shotgun microphones: uses and misconceptions

Shotgun microphones fall into a category called “high-directionality microphones.” They are more directional than a typical cardioid or supercardioid microphone. This means that they reject unwanted sounds coming at the microphone from the sides, thus allowing clearer pickup of the desired sound source at which the microphone is pointed, or the “on-axis” source. A typical use for a shotgun microphone is to pick up a desired sound source located some distance away, and that, for whatever reason, cannot be approached or close miked. Think of the bat crack from a Major Leaguer or a lion’s roar.

A common misconception is that they magically reach out and grab the sound coming from a source; however, in reality, shotgun mics merely reject more of the undesirable off-axis sound (see The Myth of Microphone Reach in the FAQs on for details). This could be noise from a busy street or excessive room sound in a space where you’re recording dialog. Shotguns are also used in voiceover work, typically in situations where you don’t have a proper non-reverberant vocal booth and you need a really close and present voiceover sound. Again, the shotgun will reduce the reflected room sound that comes into the mic off-axis.

Characteristics of shotgun microphones

The main characteristic we’ve talked about so far is high directionality. Other things to look for in a shotgun microphone are high sensitivity and low self-noise. (“Self-noise” is the noise introduced to the audio path by the microphone’s circuitry. Using a microphone with too high a self-noise to capture very quiet sounds will result in audible hiss.) As mentioned earlier, shotguns typically are used when capturing sources at a distance. This often means trying to pick up a low-level signal, which is why a proper shotgun microphone needs to have a higher sensitivity than microphones designed to pick up close sources. Since the low-level sound will need to be amplified to a usable signal level, having a mic with low self-noise is critical.

What “lobar means (and more misconceptions)

If you’ve looked at shotgun mic specifications, you’ve likely seen microphones specified as “supercardioid/lobar” or “hypercardioid/lobar.” Understanding those terms requires knowing a little bit more about how a shotgun microphone gets its characteristic directionality. This is the result of an interference tube, which is mounted to the front of the microphone capsule (typically a condenser). It has several openings along its length, which are designed to allow sound to enter the tube.

The interference tube enables the microphone to discriminate between on-axis and off-axis sounds by forcing each type of sound to arrive at the capsule in a different manner.

On-axis sounds share a uniform path length to the microphone capsule. Because they arrive at the same time, they end up being what we call “in phase” and are thus accepted by the mic element and passed down the audio circuit.

Uniform Path Lengths Diagram

Off-axis sounds arrive at the openings of the interference tube at the same time, but they will have different paths to the capsule depending upon where they enter the tube. Sounds that enter farther down the tube have a longer path length than those entering nearer to the capsule. These waves arrive at different times and are thus “out of phase,” which results in the phase cancellation of that sound. Maximum cancellation occurs at frequencies where the phase difference is ½ wavelength.

Sound Wave diagram

The result is a narrow, highly directional lobe of sound pickup at the front of the microphone. Shotgun polar patterns, characterized by such lobes, are thus called “lobar.”

It’s important to note that the lowest frequency that can be adequately cancelled is directly related to the length of the interference tube. The longer the tube, the lower the frequency at which the tube is effective in reducing off-axis sound. To reject sound down to, say, 100 Hz would require a tube 5.5 feet long!

Many people think that the length of the tube determines only the overall sound acceptance angle. While that is somewhat true, it’s very much a frequency-dependent relationship. Below the frequency at which the interference tube is effective, the directional pattern comes from the microphone cartridge itself, usually a hypercardioid. The composite polar response would be specified as hypercardioid/lobar: hypercardioid at low frequencies and lobar at frequencies where the tube is working.

Below we see the polar response at several frequencies for the VP89L, which has an 18-inch interference tube.

Polar Response of VP89L Shotgun Mic

As the frequency increases, the directionality of the microphone pickup pattern becomes much tighter. Because the VP89L interference tube is quite long, the microphone is able to maintain directionality to fairly low frequency, but by around 250 Hz, the polar response is mostly hypercardioid. Also, note the smooth polar response at high frequencies and minimal undesirable side-lobes.

Another way of looking at directionality

A really cool way to understand the directionality of a microphone as it relates to frequency is to look at a graph of its “directivity index” (DI). The directivity index is the ratio of on-axis pickup relative to the sound pickup in all directions, specified in dB. The higher the number, the more directional the microphone.

An omnidirectional microphone has a DI of 0dB since it picks up sound equally in all directions. A hypercardioid microphone has a DI of 6.0 dB. This graph illustrates the frequency at which the microphone’s directionality really takes off, which, again, is dependent on its length. The directivity index graph below compares the VP89S (short), VP89M (medium), and VP89L (long) shotguns. Notice how the cardioid pattern stays uniformly directional with frequency, while the shotgun mics become increasingly directional at lower frequencies proportional to the length of their interference tubes.

Directivity Index Comparing VP89S, VP89M, VP89L

So which length should I use?

Depends! A longer interference tube will reject the most off-axis sound, but is also more difficult to work with because of the length. It is quite sensitive to positioning and requires a fixed mic / source or a skilled boom operator since moving the mic even slightly off-axis will result in attenuation of the sound source. For very distant sounds and /or loud environments, this is often the best option. A medium shotgun works well in most situations for booming and voice pickup. A short shotgun is less directional than its longer siblings but often useful where length must be minimized; it still provides better rejection of off-axis high frequencies than a hypercardioid microphone would. Of course, the Shure A89U “double barrel” U-adapter also can be used in these situations as it minimizes total length by placing the preamp below the tube.

The quality of rejection is as important as the degree of rejection. Even a highly directional shotgun will admit off-axis sound at certain frequencies. When this audio is colored by comb-filtering artifacts, your end result will be affected.

Most shotgun mics are reasonably good at capturing on-axis audio, but for the best shotgun, it’s important to look for low-self noise and high sensitivity in conjunction with a natural on-axis sound and uniform off-axis rejection. This will ensure the best audio overall.

Subscribe here
Matthew Koschak

Matthew Koschak

Matthew Koschak received a BS in Physics with an Emphasis in Acoustics from Northern Illinois University. He joined Shure as an acoustical engineer in 2006 and was a member of the team that developed the VP89 series of microphones and the VP83 camera-mounted shotgun microphone. He plays drums in rock bands and enjoys building and flying experimental aircraft.

Show Comments (5)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  • Timothy says:

    Nobody, but nobody gives an angle of directionality for a given shotgun mic at a given frequency like they do for a horn loaded driver at a given frequency. Why not? One focuses sound the other reception of sound based on frequency. This isn’t black magic. It happens repeatably at a given angle for a given frequency yet only the speaker manufacturers are kind enough to give it to us. Interference tubes also work as directional speakers. For goodness sake, put a speaker in the tube and plot the directivity. Having just the tube directivity vs frequency would be better than the vague bs info currently supplied.

  • Stan Searing says:

    “To reject sound down to, say, 100 Hz would require a tube 5.5 feet long!”
    I believe the 90 degree off-axis cancellation is sinc(l*f/c), so you would need an 11 foot interference tube for 100 Hz cancellation. At half a wavelength the sound entering the tube at the capsule end cancels with the sound entering at the far end, but all the sound of this frequency entering the tube in between the ends is additive. (In the equation above: l is interference tube length; f is frequency; c is the speed of sound.)
    Sound from angles other than 90 degrees requires an even longer tube.
    Hole geometry along the tube will, of course, affect the results.

    • webmaster says:

      Hi, Stan. Here is Matthew’s response:

      “Thanks for your comment Stan! The 5.5 foot value was based on the low frequency cutoff for the tube, defined as Fc=c/2L where c is the speed of sound and L the length of the tube. I do agree that although this is where the tube starts ‘working’, a significant increase in directivity index won’t occur until a higher frequency.”

  • Paul says:

    Matthew. What mic would you suggest to capture an alter wedding. I’d like to place something on the ground, maybe 5-10′ from where the minister and bride and groom are standing giving vows, to capture the convo and mix it though a sound system .

    • webmaster webmaster says:

      Hi Paul! Thanks for your question. Here’s Matt’s answer:

      In this case the best method is probably placing an omnidirectional lavalier mic (WL183, WL93 or Mx150/O) on the minister. As long as the bride and groom are standing close to the minister (which is typical during the vows), the single lav mic will adequately pick up all three for sound reinforcement.

      A medium length shotgun (VP89M) in front could also work if miking the officiant isn’t an option for some reason. Since you are sending it through a sound system, it’s important to keep the mic as close as possible to maximize gain-before-feedback and signal-to-noise ratio.

      I’m assuming you mean an altar indoors, but if it’s outdoors, windscreens on all mics is a must!

Short URL